---

Discussion

Ann Tofado:

It demonstrates administrative continuity, but not political resolution. The Palestinian Ministry of Education and Higher Education launched the school year on September 19 and says more than 420,000 students are expected in about 610 ministry schools and education centres. United Nations Relief and Works Agency, or UNRWA, facilities are expected to serve roughly 100,000 more. Those are ministry-reported capacity and enrolment figures, not an independently audited attendance count. Even so, the reopening gives the ministry a visible claim to relevance: it can still organize a public service across a devastated territory. What it does not show is that Gaza’s future governing arrangement is settled, or that the ceasefire has created reliable conditions for ordinary administration.

Red Velhouse:

So the reopening is both a service and a political signal. But the phrase “returning to school for the first time in three years” can sound as though no education existed during the war. Priya, what needs qualifying?

Priya Merlan:

The important qualification is that children were largely excluded from normal formal, face-to-face schooling, not from every form of learning. Since October 2023, some received digital lessons, recreational activities, non-formal instruction or services in temporary learning spaces. The United Nations Children’s Fund, or UNICEF, estimated in April that about 700,000 children aged four to seventeen had missed almost three consecutive years of formal, in-person schooling. So the change now is the scale-up of face-to-face education—not the sudden appearance of education after a total vacuum. That distinction matters when we measure recovery and learning loss.

Kate Burvish:

And it matters economically because “enrolled” can sound more reassuring than it is. The ministry’s figures describe intended participation and available places, not necessarily consistent attendance. Families may lack uniforms, notebooks or pens. Displacement can make a school technically available but practically unreachable. If a child attends for a few days and then stops because transport, food or safety becomes impossible, the system has opened on paper without restoring the investment in human capital.

Red Velhouse:

That distinction between opening and sustained access takes us to the physical conditions. UNICEF estimated that nearly 98 percent of school buildings were damaged, and more than 93 percent needed major rehabilitation or full reconstruction. Priya, what does a safe learning environment require when classes are taking place in damaged buildings, tents and temporary facilities?

Priya Merlan:

Safety has to mean more than a roof overhead. Children need routes that are reasonably secure, buildings screened for structural hazards, water and sanitation, space that is not dangerously overcrowded, and protection from rubble and unexploded ordnance. The reported damage percentages establish extensive destruction, but they do not mean every building is equally unusable. That is why facility-by-facility safety assessments matter. Health also includes continuity: a child repeatedly moved between shelters or learning sites carries a different burden from a child attending a stable classroom.

Ann Tofado:

And each of those standards depends on political authority. The ceasefire is fragile, with continuing strikes and unresolved security and reconstruction questions. Safe access depends on movement rules, rubble clearance, aid entry and the status of military positions. A ministry can announce a school calendar, but it cannot by itself secure every road or authorize every shipment. That creates a gap between formal authority and operational authority. Families will judge the institutions controlling that gap, regardless of which institution claims credit for the reopening.

Red Velhouse:

That gap also raises the question of who is supposed to provide civilian services. Hamas announced that it had dissolved its de facto Gaza government and was prepared to transfer authority to a Palestinian technocratic committee. Ann, does the school reopening strengthen that transition?

Ann Tofado:

Only provisionally. Hamas’s announcement could make a handover of civilian functions more plausible, but implementation remains blocked by disputes over disarmament, governance and reconstruction. Education is a useful test because it is visible, recurring and administratively demanding. Someone must hire or compensate teachers, approve materials, maintain buildings, coordinate with UNRWA, and manage examinations. If multiple authorities compete, or if external actors restrict access, schools become evidence of fragmented governance rather than a bridge beyond it. The ministry’s legitimacy will depend less on the opening ceremony than on reliable delivery month after month.

Kate Burvish:

That is also a financing and control problem. Donors want money to produce classrooms and learning, but they also want safeguards against diversion, favoritism and procurement delays. Centralizing reconstruction funds may improve coordination; it may also reduce local responsiveness if the authority is weak or disputed. Splitting funds among agencies can create parallel systems and duplicated costs. The economic question is not simply how much money is pledged. It is who can convert financing into functioning schools under severe access and security constraints.

Red Velhouse:

The World Bank, the United Nations and the European Union estimate about 71.4 billion dollars in recovery and reconstruction needs over the next decade. Education must compete with housing, health, water and debris removal. Kate, what is the strongest case for prioritizing it now?

Kate Burvish:

Education is both an immediate service and a long-term economic asset. Temporary classrooms can restore routine quickly, while permanent reconstruction takes years. Teacher incentives, supplies and household support may improve attendance sooner than a large capital project. But temporary provision cannot become a cheaper substitute for a functioning system. If adolescents remain out of school, the likely costs include weaker skills, lower future earnings and a higher risk of permanent dropout, work driven by necessity or early marriage. Those are economic consequences, even though they begin as household survival decisions.

Priya Merlan:

And the economic calculation has to include health. UNICEF estimates that nearly all children in Gaza need some form of mental-health or psychosocial support after displacement, bereavement, injury and exposure to war. A school can provide routine and a place to identify distress, but teachers are not automatically specialist clinicians. The realistic model is layered support: a safer classroom, trained staff who can recognize warning signs, basic psychosocial services and referral pathways for children needing specialized care. We should not confuse a population-level estimate of distress with a clinical diagnosis of every child, but neither should we treat distress as incidental.

Red Velhouse:

And some children face physical barriers as well as psychological ones. The World Health Organization, or WHO, estimated that about 43,000 injured people had life-changing injuries, including roughly 10,000 children. Priya, what would inclusion require in practice?

Priya Merlan:

It requires schools to plan for access rather than add it later. Children with amputations, brain injuries, chronic illness or mobility limitations may need accessible routes, adapted toilets, suitable seating, rehabilitation referrals, flexible attendance and learning accommodations. WHO also reported that rehabilitation services were struggling to meet demand. A school may be the most consistent place to notice a problem, but it cannot replace medical care. Inclusion is therefore a coordination task among education, health and humanitarian providers—not simply a question of whether a child appears on an enrolment list.

Ann Tofado:

That coordination also reveals who is actually governing. UNRWA remains a major education provider, while its future funding and operating access are politically contested. The ministry and UNRWA may both be indispensable, but parallel systems can complicate standards, payrolls and accountability. Removing one provider without a functioning replacement would immediately reduce access. Political actors may want to claim institutional ownership, but children need cooperation between institutions. The practical arrangement may be plural even when the political rhetoric insists on a single authority.

Red Velhouse:

Before the formal school year began, the Education Cluster reported supporting 435,000 children through temporary learning spaces. By the end of August 2026, partners were managing 359 such spaces. Does that demonstrate impressive emergency capacity, or does it show how far the system remains from normal?

Kate Burvish:

Both. It shows that organizations can mobilize teachers, materials and learning sites under extraordinary constraints. More than 155,000 school bags, teaching kits and early-childhood-development kits had been received for distribution, and more than 11,000 education personnel received incentives or training. But temporary learning spaces are not equivalent to full-time schooling in functioning schools. They may have limited hours, uncertain locations and less capacity for examinations, laboratories or sustained curricula. The key economic question is whether emergency spending builds a platform for recovery or becomes a permanent, fragmented substitute.

Red Velhouse:

So the near-term test is not simply whether a site opens, but whether children can keep attending and learning there. Ann, what political conditions would make this reopening durable rather than symbolic?

Ann Tofado:

At minimum, there must be a workable division of authority, predictable access for education workers and supplies, and security arrangements that families can trust. An international monitoring mechanism could help, but it cannot indefinitely substitute for a legitimate administration able to pay staff, protect facilities and resolve disputes. The unresolved question is whether reopening becomes a shared institution across Gaza or another arena in which competing authorities demonstrate control. Political legitimacy will be earned through attendance, safety and continuity—not through declarations alone.

Red Velhouse:

Let’s end with measures rather than declarations. Priya, what should we watch over the next six months to distinguish genuine recovery from a ceremonial reopening?

Priya Merlan:

Start with regular attendance by location and vulnerable group, not just total enrolment. We should watch whether facilities remain safe, whether water and sanitation function, and whether children with disabilities can participate. We also need evidence that psychosocial support and medical referrals are available, while recognizing that wellbeing cannot be reduced to one simple score. Finally, learning itself matters. The Education Cluster reported that approximately 98 percent of registered students participated in the secondary examination, but exams are a narrow indicator. Broader recovery requires sustained instruction and evidence that children are rebuilding foundational skills.

Kate Burvish:

I would add three financial indicators: whether teacher payments and incentives remain reliable, whether supplies reach families who cannot afford them, and whether reconstruction money produces usable facilities rather than stalled projects. Distribution matters. A reopening that works for children near functioning centres but excludes displaced families or children facing transport barriers can raise the headline number while widening inequality. Donors should also compare the cost of access now with the much larger cost of adolescents permanently leaving education.

Red Velhouse:

So Gaza’s reopening is undeniably real, but its meaning depends on what happens after the first day: safe routes, consistent attendance, trained teachers, psychosocial care, disability inclusion and institutions able to cooperate. The central unresolved issue is whether Gaza can turn emergency education capacity into a stable, publicly accountable school system while security and political authority remain unsettled. Worth watching are attendance over time, the safety and coverage of learning spaces, teacher support, aid and reconstruction access, and whether a governing arrangement can sustain these services. Sources and references for this discussion are available with the episode at Factolio.com.

---

Sources and References

These sources supported the factual material used in this discussion. Factolio’s panel discussion is AI-generated from researched evidence and is written in original language.

1. Reuters, republished by Investing.com — Gaza students return to in-person schooling for first time in three years (NEWS)
2. Palestinian Ministry of Education and Higher Education — Despite destruction and blockade, academic year begins in Gaza (PRIMARY)
3. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs — Humanitarian Situation Report | 4 September 2026 (PRIMARY)
4. UNICEF State of Palestine — Gaza Strip: Situation Update and Humanitarian Response — Education, 30 April 2026 (PRIMARY)
5. UNICEF State of Palestine — Gaza’s Children Need Urgent International Support to Get Them Back to Learning (PRIMARY)
6. UNICEF — Children in Gaza need life-saving support (PRIMARY)
7. World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office — One in four injuries in Gaza is life-changing while rehabilitation services struggle to keep pace (PRIMARY)
8. World Bank, United Nations and European Union — Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment, Gaza Strip, April 2026 (DATA)
9. United Nations in Palestine — Final Gaza Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (PRIMARY)
10. Associated Press — Fatal building collapse highlights dangers plaguing Gaza nearly a year after ceasefire (NEWS)
11. Associated Press — Hamas dissolves its government in Gaza to transfer power to a UN-backed committee (NEWS)