---

Discussion

Red Velhouse:

Kate, what does a free-market rate above 2.5 million rials actually tell us?

Kate Burvish:

It shows that confidence in the rial has deteriorated sharply where households, traders and businesses try to protect themselves. But it is not the rate available to every importer or government agency. Iran has administered and subsidized currency channels too. So this is a powerful confidence signal, not a complete measure of prices or remaining reserves.

Sam Dewinski:

That distinction has historical importance. Iranian crises often begin with a widening gap between the official story and the rate people actually face. The parallel market moves first, and politics follows: who receives protected foreign currency, and who pays the market price?

Red Velhouse:

Who bears the loss first?

Kate Burvish:

The burden is strongly regressive. Minimum-wage workers, public employees, informal workers, unemployed households, pensioners and urban renters generally receive income in rials while facing prices that can adjust daily. Food, rent, medicine and imported goods are especially painful. Households with export earnings, foreign-currency income or hard assets are partly protected; others cut consumption, borrow, spend savings or sell assets.

Ann Tofado:

Pensioners are especially vulnerable. They usually cannot respond by working more or moving into a better-paid sector. Medical expenses can rise alongside food and housing costs, while pension adjustments arrive periodically. They experience the exchange-rate crisis as a monthly decision about which necessities to postpone.

Red Velhouse:

Wages and pensions did rise. Are they keeping up?

Kate Burvish:

Not consistently, based on the available comparisons. For the Iranian year beginning March 21, 2026, the statutory minimum wage and minimum pension rose about 60 percent; other pension levels rose 45 percent plus a fixed payment. The International Monetary Fund projected average consumer-price inflation of 68.9 percent for 2026. The periods and measures are not identical, so this is not a precise real-wage calculation, but it is a clear warning that compensation can rise while purchasing power falls. Reporting also estimated that the minimum wage’s free-market dollar value dropped from roughly 125 dollars to about 104, a decline of around 17 percent.

Sam Dewinski:

And people judge official increases against the prices they personally face, not an abstract national basket. If rent, food or medicine rises faster than the adjustment, the practical loss is larger. Earlier currency crises produced the same pattern: announced raises sounded substantial, but households judged them on the next market trip.

Red Velhouse:

What happens to savings? Do people keep rials or exchange them?

Kate Burvish:

Both behaviors exist for different purposes. Rials remain necessary for wages, taxes, many retail purchases and government payments. But people with disposable income try not to leave surplus cash in rials for long. They move savings into dollars, gold coins and jewelry, silver, property, cars, equities, cryptocurrencies or other portable assets. That does not mean every family becomes fully dollarized. It means the rial becomes a poor long-term store of value.

Ann Tofado:

Access determines who can hedge. A professional household may buy some gold or dollars. A poorer family may have nothing left after groceries and rent, so it keeps rials because there is no alternative—or spends them immediately before prices rise again. That creates a political divide between people who can escape depreciation and people who experience it as less food, healthcare and security.

Sam Dewinski:

Iran has seen this before. Foreign currency and gold become savings instruments and reference prices while the rial remains the medium of daily exchange. This is partial currency substitution, not the disappearance of the national currency. The historical question is what people trust the rial to do: facilitate this week’s purchase, perhaps, but preserve next year’s savings?

Red Velhouse:

Does that shift itself weaken the rial?

Kate Burvish:

It can create a feedback loop. Expectations of depreciation increase demand for dollars, gold and other stores of value, adding pressure in the free market. A weaker rial makes imported food, medicine, machinery and components more expensive. Producers may also raise prices because inputs or expectations are tied to the dollar. Higher inflation then gives people another reason to spend or convert rials quickly.

Ann Tofado:

The government faces a difficult trade-off. It may want to defend the rial, but it must also reserve foreign currency for essential imports, maintain subsidies, finance the war and contain public anger. Multiple exchange rates can direct scarce dollars toward necessities or favored sectors, but they also create accusations that connected groups are protected while ordinary businesses and workers pay the market price.

Red Velhouse:

Sam, how does this compare with the crises of 2012 and 2018?

Sam Dewinski:

The mechanism is familiar: sanctions restrict oil revenue and banking access, confidence falls, the parallel market moves first and inflation follows. The 2011–2012 sanctions shock produced sharp parallel-market depreciation and stagflation. In 2018, exchange controls and import restrictions could not restore confidence when foreign-exchange supply was inadequate. The difference now is that those pressures are combined with active war, possible shipping disruption and infrastructure damage. History provides a pattern, not a guarantee that old interventions will work.

Red Velhouse:

What does a ten-year comparison show?

Sam Dewinski:

The World Bank recorded a September 2016 parallel-market rate of about 35,571 rials per dollar. Comparing that with more than 2.5 million today means the rial price of a dollar is roughly 70 times higher—an approximate 98.6 percent nominal loss against the dollar.

Kate Burvish:

That is a nominal market-rate comparison, not a complete measure of living standards. Iran has multiple exchange rates, market conditions have changed, and domestic prices do not rise one-for-one with the dollar because Iran produces many goods and uses subsidies and administered prices. The figure is striking, but it is not a full purchasing-power calculation.

Ann Tofado:

Even with those caveats, it creates a credibility problem. When a currency has lost that much nominal value over a decade, promises that it will simply return to an earlier rate are difficult to sustain. People may use rials because the state requires it while privately pricing risk in dollars, gold or property.

Red Velhouse:

If the conflict ends, will the rial bounce back or merely stop falling?

Kate Burvish:

A ceasefire could produce an immediate rebound by reducing panic, reopening shipping routes and lowering expectations of further damage or sanctions escalation. But without sanctions relief, reliable oil-payment channels or usable reserves, it would more likely slow the fall than restore the prewar rate. The currency could stabilize at a much weaker level while domestic prices remain high.

Sam Dewinski:

Markets can recover faster than productive capacity. Traders may respond to diplomacy within hours; oil infrastructure, transport, investment and banking relationships take much longer. A currency bounce can therefore be real and still temporary.

Ann Tofado:

A durable political signal would require more than an end to shooting: sustained sanctions relief, restored oil exports and payment channels, reserves that can actually be transferred, improved correspondent banking, functioning trade routes and lower inflationary pressures. Otherwise officials may achieve a calmer rate through controls while households continue losing purchasing power.

Kate Burvish:

The practical test is whether several indicators improve together: the gap between administered and free-market rates narrows sustainably, demand for dollars and gold becomes less frantic, import finance improves, oil proceeds arrive in usable form and inflation falls. Selling scarce reserves or imposing controls can calm the rate temporarily, but cannot create foreign exchange indefinitely.

Sam Dewinski:

So the cautious baseline is a short rebound followed by stabilization or renewed depreciation unless sanctions, oil access, reserve access and inflation dynamics change durably.

Ann Tofado:

And political legitimacy will depend on lived purchasing power. If the rial stabilizes but food, rent and medicine remain unaffordable, officials may claim currency success while households feel no meaningful recovery.

Red Velhouse:

Watch food and medicine prices, wage and pension purchasing power, gold and dollar demand, the market-rate gap, oil-payment access, strikes and diplomacy. Those indicators will show whether Iran is seeing a pause in depreciation or a genuine change in its causes.

Red Velhouse:

The rial’s collapse is transferring the costs of war, sanctions and foreign-exchange scarcity unevenly. Minimum-wage workers, pensioners, public employees, renters and households without foreign-currency income are least able to protect themselves. Families with spare income are shifting savings toward dollars, gold and other assets, while poorer households often have no hedge beyond spending rials quickly or cutting back. Compared with roughly 35,571 rials per dollar in September 2016, more than 2.5 million today represents an approximate 70-fold increase in the rial price of a dollar—an important but imperfect nominal comparison. A ceasefire could bring a rebound by reducing panic, yet durable recovery would require usable foreign exchange, restored trade and payment channels, lower inflation and credible confidence that the change will last. Sources and references for this discussion are available with the episode at Factolio.com.

---

Sources and References

These sources supported the factual material used in this discussion. Factolio’s panel discussion is AI-generated from researched evidence and is written in original language.

1. Associated Press — Iran’s currency hits a new record low as war erodes the country’s economic stability (NEWS)
2. Reuters Connect — Iran’s currency hit a new all-time low (NEWS)
3. International Monetary Fund — Islamic Republic of Iran: Country page and 2026 World Economic Outlook indicators (DATA)
4. World Bank — Islamic Republic of Iran country overview and current economic outlook (DATA)
5. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control — Iran Sanctions (PRIMARY)
6. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control — OFAC Alert: Sanctions Risk of Dealing with Teapot Oil Refineries (PRIMARY)
7. International Monetary Fund — Determinants of Inflation in Iran and Policies to Curb It (ANALYSIS)
8. International Monetary Fund — Islamic Republic of Iran: Staff Report for the 2014 Article IV Consultation (ANALYSIS)
9. World Bank — Iran Economic Monitor: Weathering Economic Challenges (ANALYSIS)
10. Reuters, republished by Euronews — Iran bans 1,300 imports as protesters and police clash over currency weakness (NEWS)
11. Reuters, republished by Investing.com — Iran says it has enough foreign currency despite U.S. sanctions (NEWS)
12. Iran International — Minimum wage rises 60 percent but workers’ dollar purchasing power falls 17 percent (NEWS)
13. Iran Ministry of Cooperatives, Labour and Social Welfare — Circular setting the minimum wage for Iranian year 1405 (PRIMARY)
14. Iran Social Security Organization — Frequently asked questions on pension increases and pension adjustment for 1405 (PRIMARY)
15. IranWire — Iranian retirees take to streets as pensions fail to keep pace with inflation (NEWS)
16. Iran International — Labor activist says protest is only path left for Iran’s retirees (NEWS)
17. Le Monde — Iran’s purchasing power is slowly collapsing under U.S. economic pressure (NEWS)
18. Associated Press — Iranians seek portable wealth as hedge against falling currency after Israel war (NEWS)
19. Taylor & Francis / International Journal of Economics and Finance — Macroeconomic policies and the Iranian economy in the era of sanctions (ANALYSIS)
20. Wiley / Cultural Anthropology — Nested (In)Securities: Commodity and Currency Circuits in an Iran under Sanctions (ANALYSIS)
21. Washington Institute for Near East Policy — Is Iran’s Currency Crisis Evidence That Sanctions Are Working? (ANALYSIS)
22. World Bank — Iran Economic Monitor: Towards Reintegration (DATA)
23. S&P Global — Sanctions relief lifts Iran’s oil outlook, but its full recovery will take time (ANALYSIS)
24. Foreign Policy — Iran’s Economic Collapse Is Highly Unlikely (ANALYSIS)